Search for: "PhotoMedex, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2010, 6:50 pm
PhotoMedex, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:20 am
See Photomedex, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 11:03 am
Photomedex, Inc., et. al., 8-07-cv-01316 (CACD February 28, 2013, Order) (Selna, J.). [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 2:54 pm
” PhotoMedex, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 2:54 pm
” PhotoMedex, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:49 pm
In PhotoMedex, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 11:32 am
Photomedex, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 1:29 am
" defendants, if you're interested: Johnson & Johnson, DermAnew, Inc., Sharper Image, Physicians Formula Holdings, Inc., Physicians Formula Cosmetics, Inc., American International Industries, Guthy-Renker Corporation, Stearn's Products, Inc., Derma E, L'Oreal S.A., L'Oreal USA, Inc., Laboratories Garnier Paris, Garnier LLC, Lancome Perfumes et Beaute, Avon Products, Inc., Mary Kay, Inc., Graf Skin Care,… [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 8:12 pm
PhotoMedex, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 10:04 am
They argued that PhotoMedex, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 6:00 am
(Jan. 15, 2010 Complaint)The Advertising Self-Regulatory Council (ASRC)PhotoMedex, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 12:21 pm
PhotoMedex involved a Lanham Act claim based upon the allegation that plaintiff PhotoMedex, Inc’s (“PhotoMedex”) competitor made false and misleading statements regarding FDA approval of a medical device marketed by the competitor. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:49 am
Coca–Cola Co., 679 F.3d 1170 (9th Cir. 2012), and PhotoMedex, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:09 pm
PhotoMedex, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 11:42 am
Just after this article was published, the Ninth Circuit issued a similar ruling on April 14, 2010, in PhotoMedex, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 8:51 am
Plaintiffs’ Legal Committee, 531 U.S. 341 (2001); PhotoMedex, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 8:03 pm
Athena argues that Allergan’s claim involves the violation of a California statute that simply incorporates FDCA provisions and is not rooted in state law tort principles.Athena argues that the Ninth Circuit’s application of Buckman in PhotoMedex, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm
Pre-Pom cases like PhotoMedex, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 1:29 pm
Id. at *5-6 (relying upon PhotoMedex, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:48 am
Friedman argued that the Ninth Circuit approved a similar claim in Photomedex, Inc. v. [read post]
